200A and 202 reproduction
frames back
in stock.
Is there something special about this year of mil-spec? Recently an auction ended for $192.50+shipping. It was NOS in the box with two generators but Im curious b/c I recently acquired a 58 Mil Spec in perfect condition. No box or extra generators though.
Likely went that high just because it was NOS. 

Found one 3 years ago NIB locally for just under $100 USD so I'm not surprised it's that high now. 
"Stop being angry, and forget about getting back at people; do not worry -- it only causes harm." Ps. 37:8
Eye-SEE-C-C Member #1333 -- MilSpecOps #003
"Michigan - from the Ojibwa word “meicigama,” meaning “great water.”
Must have been a couple guys bidding born in '58.  I've had mine several years and while not NOS, mine was in fine condition with all the goodies and box.  I probably paid about $100 for mine.
Greg -- Fiat Lux!
ICCC Member #1273
Seeker of Canadian Nickel!
Thought maybe the US QUADRANT GLOBE thats stamped on the 4 glass panels may be rare or something. 
Nope just NOS in the box. I've seen some that they are asking$250 
Mil-SpecOps #0219
Stovie and Damn proud of it

The prices on milspecs ebb and flow pretty abruptly.  I've seen them go that high (or higher), and then a few days later, the same thing will bring 1/3 the price.  Just depends on who's looking at the time.
Jeepster the US on the glass is frosting on the cake. Usually found on the pre 1960's glass.
Welcome to the Coleman Collectors Forum, an international forum of Coleman enthusiast and collectors, as such people from all over the world come here to read about Coleman collecting, repair, and to meet and make friends. The pages contained here are intended for the use of amateur collectors and people interested in Coleman collecting, restoration and repair as a hobby. It goes without saying to refrain from political posts, personal attacks and inflammatory posts.

Please note, all postings are the personal opinions of the members posting, the owner, administrators and moderators of the forum do not warrant the accuracy of posted information or endorse the safety of such.